Oklahoma v. EPA, 145 S. Ct. 1720 (2025) (Gorsuch, J., concurring in the judgment).
https://gorsuch.codexpublicus.org/works/zd6g9b/
Oklahoma v. EPA
JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE joins, concurring in the judgment.¶
The Court holds that the proper venue for this litigation lies in an appropriate regional circuit, not in the D. C. Circuit. I agree. As I explain in today’s companion case, however, the Court and I arrive at that conclusion by different paths. See EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C. , 605 U. S. ___, ___–___ (2025) (GORSUCH, J., dissenting) (slip op., at 13–14). Accordingly, I am unable to join the Court’s opinion, but I am pleased to concur in its judgment.¶
Full text, 94 words. Public domain: Edicts of government, 17 U.S.C. 105 and the government edicts doctrine. The segmenter proposed where this opinion starts and ends, and I haven't confirmed it by hand yet.
Source SHA-256 9d3b13e66a0bdfc43422f7bc714dce6e8c3d1ec1dee0c898fb432779aa3943b2
Printed from the Neil Gorsuch Library